If NHTSA were to propose system requirements for occupant detection (either mandatory or as a compliance option), seat occupancy criteria might be necessary to objectively specify when a seat is occupied for the purposes of NHTSA's compliance testing. to submit a report to Congress describing the reasons for not prescribing such a standard. DOT HS 811 097. 2 Of the children who were killed in a crash, 38% were not buckled up. 90. We especially seek comment on whether a rear seat belt warning should be required for high-occupancy vehicles such as 15-passenger vans, large sport utility vehicles, school buses, and large trucks and vans with a GVWR less than or equal to 4,536 kg (10,000 lb).[86]. To the extent possible, we will also consider comments that the docket receives after that date. Should information about the reconnection of electrical components for any removable/stowable seats be placed in close proximity to the seat's electrical connection? Id. the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on documents in the last year, by the Justice Department Register documents. Your body reacts to an alarm reaction by releasing _______ into your blood stream: with severe emotional pain, the driver could turn to substance ___ to hide emotional pain. Federal Register issue. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp. DOT HS 811 206. [97] The study found that overall, drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning system were satisfied with the system and noticed an increase in rear seat belt use. Volvo, Toyota, Mazda, Ford and Jaguar Land Rover offer vehicles for sale in the U.S. with rear seat belt warning systems. when you are experiencing heightened stress, emotions or fatigue, the driver should: Exhaustion can manifest itself in your life in such things as: Both a and b Although it is of no doubt that the use of seatbelt reduces the incidence and severity of MVC-induced TLJ injury, how it is protective for front-seat occupants of an automobile after rollover crashes is unclear. 208, as well as twenty different enhanced warning systems. 16. [27] 0000003571 00000 n It has also been pointed out that the research on seat belt use and acceptability among drivers may not be representative of situations where multiple passengers are present and that further evaluation is warranted on the annoyance and acceptance of seat belt warnings. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML documents in the last year, 1008 Using a seat belt is one of the most effective actions a motor vehicle occupant can take to prevent death and injury in a crash. 65. Although NHTSA did not previously have the authority to require, or specify as a compliance option, a seat belt warning with an audible signal lasting more than 8 seconds, the agency facilitated the voluntary adoption of enhanced warnings through a series of legal interpretations that determined that the Safety Act did not prohibit manufacturers from using enhanced warning systems (e.g., systems with audible warnings that lasted more than 8 seconds) as long as the manufacturer differentiated the voluntarily-provided signal from the required signal (for example, by a clearly distinguishable lapse in time between the two signals). WebSingle-vehicle crashes represent the largest percentage of both unbelted KA and KABCO crashes; however, single-vehicle is over-represented in unbelted KA crashes (51.0 We will consider all comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above. 208 does not require this. There could be instances for manual connection seats where the driver either forgets to make the connection or makes an improper connection. ECE Regulation No. Five commenters opposed requiring rear seat belt warnings: Ford Motor Company, General Motors, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (now known as the Association of Global Automakers), and a commenter from the general public. Charles J. Kahane. [91] See Transportation Research Board Study, supra, p. 31 n.3. Unbelted vehicle occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield,steering column, and dashboard. NHTSA seeks comment on potential consumer acceptance concerns with a proposed seat belt warning system. Fifteen-passenger vans are classified as buses because they are designed for carrying more than ten persons. See S571.3. 27. abrupt turns July 2003. 208, S29.1(e), and correspond to the height and weight requirements for a child who is used as an alternative for the 6-year-old child test dummy for compliance testing of advanced air bag systems utilizing static suppression. DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra. 2015. 0000046355 00000 n Such redesign would have to take into account visibility, interaction with existing signals and displays, available space on the instrument panel, and effectiveness, as well as other factors. As noted above, an enhanced warning that activates for an unoccupied seat could be a nuisance that either desensitizes the occupants to the warning signal or leads them to circumvent or defeat the warning. The thrill of danger Survey of Principal Drivers of Vehicles with a Rear Seat Belt Reminder System. The study found that overall, drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning system were satisfied with the system and noticed an increase in rear seat belt use. Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for substantive data to be relied on and used by NHTSA, it must meet the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection Open for Comment, Applications for New Awards-American History and Civics Education National Activities Program, Economic Sanctions & Foreign Assets Control, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Salmonella in Not-Ready-To-Eat Breaded Stuffed Chicken Products, Authority To Order the Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty To Address International Drug Trafficking, Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to Environmental Justice for All, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Current Driver's Seat Belt Warning Requirements, NHTSA Experience in the 1970s: Consumer Backlash Against Seat Belt Interlock and Subsequent Statutory Limitation on Belt Warning Requirements, IV. documents in the last year, 84 NHTSA seeks comment on whether the warning should be visible to the driver, the rear passenger(s), or both. corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. 35. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp. [53] NHTSA-2002-13226. 16, Revision 9 8.4.2.4.1.1. to 8.4.2.4.1.3. 75-76. 208, Occupant crash protection, to require a seat belt use warning system for rear seats. 2015. These included warning systems that had only the minimum features required by FMVSS No. MVOSS does, however, provide demographic detail that cannot be observed and insight into the reasons people do and do not use seat belts. 4. Wandering eyes and a basic lack of attention to the road _________ the potential for a collision. Because, unlike NOPUS, it is not observational, the MVOSS is not the best indicator of national belt use. The ECE regulations provide that the rear seat belt warning requirements will not apply to removable rear seats or to seats in a row in which there is a suspension seat until September 2022. [11] We also note that school buses of all sizes offer passengers compartmentalization protection to reduce the risk of crash injury, even to the unbelted. 32. "|\JUe373 {Pa How much more effective would the more informative negative-only and full-status systems be? 0000028439 00000 n First, what type of occupants should the criteria be based on; e.g., should they be based on a mid-size male, small-size female, or a child? 22. 208 is intended to reduce the likelihood of occupant deaths and the likelihood and severity of occupant injuries in crashes. they also present potential consumer acceptance challenges for the same reasons. 0000047766 00000 n Occupant detection systems are practical for the front outboard passenger seating position, as that passenger seat is not typically subject to as many of the potential complications to occupant detection posed by rear seats (such as large occupants spanning multiple seating positions). We have asked commenters to answer a variety of questions to elicit practical information about alternative approaches and relevant technical data. For example, for the static suppression and low-risk deployment compliance options, FMVSS No. the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with Accordingly, NHTSA might need to propose seat occupancy criteria. On November 21, 2007, Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (petitioners) petitioned NHTSA to amend FMVSS No. Vehicle occupants include drivers and passengers. 57. The Public Inspection page Some of these strategies are non-regulatory; some are regulatory. The guidelines could identify best practices for manufacturers who wish to equip vehicles with a rear seat belt warning system. 16, Revision 9 8.4.2.4.1. regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of As it continues with this proceeding, NHTSA is seeking comment on a variety of issues related to a potential requirement for a rear seat belt warning system. shot of 80 proof whiskey, a 5 oz. %%EOF For example, a warning system could be defeated if: There are also scenarios involving inadvertent circumvention that could impact the effectiveness and accuracy of a rear belt warning system. The vehicle-based strategies included encouraging vehicle manufacturers to voluntarily install enhanced seat belt warning systems; providing consumer information on vehicles equipped with enhanced warning systems as part of NCAP; and continued monitoring and assessment of the effectiveness and acceptability of enhanced seat belt warnings through research. With respect to school buses, we acknowledge that a rear seat belt warning requirement might place additional cost burdens on school systems, given that such cost can lead to reductions in school bus service, resulting in greater risk to students. 0000184582 00000 n This feature is not available for this document. This requires, among other things, that a federal motor vehicle safety standard be practicable, meet the need for motor vehicle safety, and be stated in objective terms. The Committee also requested that the study consider potential legislative and regulatory actions to facilitate installation of devices to encourage seat belt use. N. Lerner et al. Euro New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)[2] Motor vehicle safety standard means a minimum performance standard for motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment. ECE Regulation No. ECE Regulation No. A.) 13. Seat belts are effective in most types of crashes. Minimum duration. In response, the agency conducted a multi-phase research study (described below). To ensure that your comments are considered by the agency, make sure to submit them by the comment period deadline identified in the. [67] The occupant is repositioned to a location within the air bag deployment path just prior to deployment by a pre-impact or at-impact event. Foldable or stowable seats in the second row are not as prominent in minivans. [93] better and aid in comparing the online edition to the print edition. We believe that occupant detection is voluntarily used in the front passenger seat to avoid having an audible warning activate for an unoccupied seat. A.) startxref A.) It is not an official legal edition of the Federal 19. In 2010, the agency published a Request for Comments (RFC) on the petition. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day. Impressing passengers. ECE Regulation No. 0000010422 00000 n [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. Webpassenger using both unbelted 5th percentile female and unbelted 50th percentile male dummies in the rigid barrier crash tests at 30-mph. NHTSA seeks comment on, among other things, potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. These types of seats might present an issue for a rear seat belt warning system because the electrical connection might not be reestablished for these seats when the seat is reinstalled. In accordance with MAP-21, in early 2013 NHTSA initiated a rulemaking proceeding when it submitted for public comment a proposal to undertake a study regarding the effectiveness of existing rear seat belt warning systems. Occupant detection is utilized by the advanced air bags to properly classify the occupant in the seat (e.g., child, adult, small-statured adult) so that the advanced frontal air bag systems can determine if and with what level of power the front air bag will inflate. Would occupant detection be necessary for these systems? i?J?C$If 'QHv3Sl1. 54, No. 0000003534 00000 n Safety Belt and Helmet Use in 2002Overall Results. Although seat belt use has steadily increased over the past few decades, usage rates for rear belts have consistently been below those for the front seats. You may also see the comments on the internet. The agency's 2015 Survey of Principal Drivers of Vehicles with a Rear Seat Belt Reminder System found that a change of status warning is effective in getting passengers to refasten their seat belt. WebUnbelted vehicle occupants reach 0 mph by striking the windshield, steering column and dashboard. In order for a rear seat belt warning to have an impact on seat belt use, it must balance effectiveness with acceptability. [14] 208 minimum requirements. It recommended that rear seat belt warning systems be developed and that NHTSA undertake a broad, multi-year program of research on the effectiveness and acceptability of different seat belt warning systems to establish a basis for future regulation. 13771 (82 FR 9339 (Feb. 3, 2017)) because it is an advance notice of proposed rulemaking.Start Printed Page 51090. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 Vehicle Model Year Fatalities/MRVY Information of this sort is already required by FMVSS No. Euro NCAP specifies at least a 90 second visual signal for the front seats and only a 60 second visual signal for the rear seats in order to earn bonus points. NHTSA also seeks comment on warning systems that utilize occupant detection. 208 does not require this. The Effectiveness of Enhanced Seat Belt Reminder Systems Draft Report: Observational Field Data Collection Methodology and Findings. 33. at 31202(a)(2) (repealing portion of 49 U.S.C. NHTSA requests any data or studies concerning the effectiveness of rear seat belt warnings. Because of the low prevalence and limited history with rear seat belt warnings, NHTSA has limited direct data on the effectiveness of rear seat belt warnings. We seek comment on the technological and economic challenges that might be posed by different types of warning systems, including the type of equipment and re-design they might necessitate. 30111, NHTSA seeks comment on whether it should consider any non-regulatory approaches to address this issue. Minimum duration. 96. 2. Owner's manual/label requirements. 3. NHTSA has granted Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety's petition. In Florida, immersion in water or fire as a result of a collision happens in less than ________ of all collisions annually. This could be addressed by requiring a sequential logic system. The city of Provo in Utah, tats-Unis, has 44 public charging station ports (Level 2 and Level 3) within 15km. The results of NHTSA's research are discussed in more detail in Section VI.A and VI.C-D. 0 [9] 23. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. Li, R., Pickrell, T.M. Most currently-produced vehicles also have a seat belt warning for the front outboard passenger seat, although FMVSS No. Even for seats where the connections are automatically established when the seat is reinstalled, the automatic connectors might malfunction and a proper connection may not be made. You may submit comments to the docket number identified in the heading of this document by any of the following methods: Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and docket number. See Donna Glassbrenner. You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000, (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html. We also seek comment on balancing effectiveness with costs, technological feasibility, and acceptability. 0000015312 00000 n Under the second option, when the key is turned to the on or start position, the vehicle must provide a visual warning for 4 to 8 seconds (regardless of whether the driver seat belt is fastened) and an audible warning lasting 4 to 8 seconds, if the driver seat belt is not in use. f. Hg2Cl2\mathrm{Hg}_2 \mathrm{Cl}_2Hg2Cl2 The agency has presented a wide variety of different potential alert systems, all with different cost and effectiveness profiles, and is not at this time conducting a cost-benefit analysis on any particular approach. Such systems are also better able to appropriately target audible warnings or longer-duration visual warnings (enhanced warnings). A positive-only system would be the least technically complex of the three. For infants and toddlers in light trucks, the corresponding reductions are 58% and 59%, respectively. The petitioners provided a range of estimates for how much a rear seat belt warning system could increase rear belt use. See Docket No. Of those who wore seat belts most of the time as drivers, only a small percentage said they wore them always (12%) or most of the time (21%) when riding in the rear. NHTSA has not subsequently amended FMVSS No. of the issuing agency.
Ross Johnson Obituary,
Where Do Leprechauns Live In Ireland,
Pros And Cons Of Selling On Wayfair,
Infertile Chameleon Eggs,
Used Sportsman 267 Masters For Sale,
Articles U