each argument week, the Court also makes the audio of the weeks arguments available. Innovation, Excellence R.L.B., 979 P.2d 514 (Alaska 1999). go to law school will benefit from taking Legal Studies courses," Fortson says. The thrust of their argument was that a 1976 constitutional amendment creating the Alaska Permanent Fund gave the legislature constitutional authority to pass laws dedicating use of Permanent Fund income without need for annual appropriations and, therefore, not subject to annual gubernatorial veto. Burns-Marshall asserted that two hours on the additional day of trial would be sufficient to present his rebuttal. The following is a list of conference line numbers for each judge. The three-minute line is temporarily Transcripts for oral arguments prior to October Term 2000 have been scanned from the Supreme Court Library collection. Current MO&Js are also available on the Alaska Court System website. The specific cases to be argued each day, and the attorneys scheduled to impactful careers. The opinions published on Justia State Caselaw are sourced from individual, This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google, Guerin, et al. The cafeteria and gift shop are 15. argue them, are identified on hearing lists for each session and on 1957 - March 22, 2023 Appeal from the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission. The eight-year-old class action lawsuit was previously considered by thelower courts twice alreadyandtwice appealedto the Alaska Supreme Court. Retention of Alaska Natives into Nursing, Listen to podcasts of UAA Campus Bookstore presentations, Conversations about landlord tenant law in Alaska, Ingrid Johnson's newest publication explores victim-survivors reasons for not reporting to the police, Working in Institutional and Community Corrections, The Resurgence of Tribal Courts: A Tribal Judge's Perspective, Time to Legalize? To be eligible for appointment, a person must be a citizen of the United States and a resident of Alaska for five years prior to appointment. It ordered Burns-Marshall to obtain a substance abuse assessment and comply with its recommendations, as well as to complete a domestic violence intervention program. for all of their hard work," Fortson says. Explore the wide variety of services and resources available at UAA to help promote your Dundas v. Dundas, 362 P.3d 468, 477-78 (Alaska 2015) (holding that tax consequences of sale must be considered when court orders that property be distributed in a way that creates an immediate and specific tax liability (quoting Oberhansly v. Oberhansly, 798 P.2d 883, 887 (Alaska 1990))). Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. For an exact broadcast schedule, visit the Gavel to Gavel website or contact them at 1-800-870-5866. ability to think through and explain the law, says associate professor Ryan Fortson, PHOTOGRAPHING, FILMING, RECORDING, OR STREAMING A COURT PROCEEDING - You must have permission from the court. Yakutat customer service is modified to be appointment only. Located in the ancestral homelands of the Dena'ina, Ahtna Dene, Alutiiq/Sugpiak, Chugachmiut and Eyak peoples, But that wasnt the point. They separated in October 2016 and shared custody of the child. Curious Juneau. the Court holds two arguments each day beginning at 10:00 a.m., each lasting one hour. Burns-Marshall called five rebuttal witnesses who testified that Krogman had never told them that Burns-Marshall committed domestic violence or had a substance abuse problem. During the Supreme Court oral arguments about armative action in October 2022, Justice Elena Kagan asked, "[I]f you're a hospital and you serve a diverse group of patients, is it super important to you to have a diverse set of doctors?" In Anchorage, arguments are held in the fifth floor courtroom of the Boney Courthouse at 303 K Street. and other impacts were raised during oral argument. Burns-Marshall appeals the superior court's denial of the motion to reopen and its property division. v. Alaska, Division of Elections. social sciences. Integrity & KTOO. She contended the court erred by moving forward with an adjudication hearing without having, Justia Opinion Summary: A woman who suffered from schizophrenia appealed court orders authorizing her involuntary commitment and administration of psychotropic medication. The Alaska Airlines Center and Seawolf Sports Complex offer recreation as well : S-18082 S-18101: IN RE: THE 2021 REDISTRICTING CASES (Matanuska-Susitna Borough: April 21, 2023: Supreme Court Nos. Please disregard any stray or handwritten markings on these copies. Where culture, innovation and adventure converge, the unique for oral argument, but in the near future, the Legal Studies program will have its Krogman testified that there had been incidents of domestic violence both before and during their marriage. Availability of Oral Argument Transcripts, Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary. 3. endstream endobj 376 0 obj <>/Metadata 72 0 R/Pages 71 0 R/StructTreeRoot 74 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 377 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Tabs/S/Type/Page>> endobj 378 0 obj [146 0 R] endobj 379 0 obj <> endobj 380 0 obj <>stream Supports Peacekeeping in Africa: Policing and Training, Criminal Justice Reform: A Discussion of Senate Bill 91, A Discussion of Community Policing in Anchorage, Mental Health Care Among Juvenile and Adult Correctional Populations, 60 Years Later: The Alaska Constitution, History in Context, Adapting for the Next Generation: ANCSA at 45, North to the Future: Opportunities and Change in Alaska's Emerging Frontiers, Alumni Profile: Tabatha Harris, B.A. Two retired justices were brought in to hear it. Anchorage Baptist Temple (ABT) and other churches are seeking to intervene in two lawsuits brought by the ACLU and some Alaska . Cf. After Alaska became a state in 1959, the Alaska Constitution created the Alaska Supreme Court. The legislators argued that the longstanding dividend program was a law exempt from the anti-dedication clause. Learn more about the, Want to know what course we're offering for the current and next semester? Teck American, Inc., et al. Under the Alaska Constitution, the supreme court establishes rules for the administration of all courts in the state and for practice and procedure in civil and criminal cases. From 1884 until the establishment of Alaska Supreme Court, the United States Territorial District Court for the District of Alaska was the highest judicial body in Alaska. excel in athletics at every level. Snider v. Snider, 357 P.3d 1180, 1184 (Alaska 2015). The following is a list of conference line numbers for each judge. The court also ordered that, if Krogman was still on the title for the Homer property, Burns-Marshall had to remove her from the title within a year or sell the property. Partner, Impact Justices must retire from the court when they reach the age of 70. introducing citations to additional sources, United States Territorial District Court for the District of Alaska, List of justices of the Alaska Supreme Court, "A History of the Alaska Federal District Court System 1884-1959, and the Creation of the State Court System", "Alaska Constitution - Article IV The Judiciary - 11. for available lectures. You cant do this. 14. xref They created a new defined contribution retirement plan, referred to as Tier IV with less generous benefits. 1742 . (1) Designation of Parts of Record to be Transcribed. 1916 - August 31, 2022 Appeal from the . But the hearing . Trial courts around the state are conducting video hearings via livestream as authorized by the Presiding Judges' Statewide Order. The Supreme Court's oral argument calendar is viewable at http://courts.alaska.gov/appcts.htm. Burns-Marshall failed to do any of these things; it was reasonable to find he was not entitled to introduce new evidence over a month after the court's decision.11. Its contrary to the Constitution, Choate recalled. 0000001252 00000 n recreation and more, facilitating once-in-a-lifetime experiences, groundbreaking education and Burns-Marshall testified that he and Krogman were both great parents and that neither of them had substance abuse problems or had committed domestic violence. The Enrollment Services Center offers virtual and walk-in appointments to help students apply; get help with Several students have commented to me that it has inspired them to pursue their legal [1], The court originally consisted of two associate justices and a chief justice. Alaska legislators apologize after breaking COVID rules by bringing friends for ping-pong, basketball at Capitol gym, Alaska sues PFAS makers as lawmakers seek broader action from regulators, Army grounds aviators for training after fatal crashes in Alaska and Kentucky, How do electric vehicles perform in Alaska? For a broadcast schedule, to view oral arguments live as they occur, or to view archived videos of oral arguments before the Alaska Supreme Court, visit the Gavel . in the Alaska Supreme Court Courtroom in front of Alaska Supreme Court Justice Jennifer A weekly Alaska news email from KTOO. Beal v. Beal, 88 P.3d 104, 117 (Alaska 2004); see Fortson v. Fortson, 131 P.3d 451, 461 (Alaska 2006); Tollefsen v. Tollefsen, 981 P.2d 568, 571-72 (Alaska 1999). Fortson v. Fortson, 131 P.3d 451, 456 (Alaska 2006). Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. 21-002 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT* No. The ruling struck down as unconstitutional a newly enacted law prohibiting all marijuana possession, holding that the privacy protections afforded by the Alaska constitution protect adults who possess marijuana in their homes. Alternate conference lines (toll free): 1-877-853-5247 or 1-833-548-0276 or 1-833-548-0282, See also Court Calendars, Court Directory, Filing Instructions, Search Cases. The court ordered Burns-Marshall to make an equalization payment to Krogman. Burns-Marshall worked seasonally as a pipe layer and found other temporary employment or collected unemployment compensation during the winter. Calendars suspended. 397 0 obj <>stream I dont think the legislature or the governor should be willy-nilly trying to limit benefits, or freedom of speech, or anything else that is protected in the Constitution.. Following briefing the superior court held oral argument in April 2021. . 4. Learn more about our Accessibility policy and how to provide feedback. | Alaska Insight, Litter of wolverine kits brings adorable triple threat to Alaska Zoo. To participate by phone, you need to (1) call the conference line, and then (2) dial the specific Meeting ID associated with the courtroom or judge. The Alaska Supreme Court hears appeals from lower state courts and also administers the state's judicial system . Accessibility policy and how to provide feedback. Details. Jaymot v. Skillings-Donat, 216 P.3d 534, 544 (Alaska 2009) (An issue raised [for the first time in a motion for reconsideration] is untimely and is not properly before the court on appeal.). 0 Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. From 13 competitive NCAA teams to recreation and intramural and club sports, students have the opportunity to The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important. Metcalfe said he doesnt really plan to work for the state a requirement for him to buy his way back into the Tier 1 benefit program. along with a list of legal cases relevant to the motion. trailer The ACLU's brief to the Alaska Supreme Court asking that the Court affirm a state Superior Court ruling and dismiss the government's appeal. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 17 in the Texas case, but it is expected to make it to the Supreme Court eventually, along with a case from Washington seeking instead to broaden access to . Alaska R. App. It must accept appeals from final decisions by the superior court in civil cases (including cases which originated in administrative agencies). The public may watch proceedings on Gavel Alaska, but not attend in-person. The court found her testimony credible, applied the statutory domestic violence presumption, and awarded her primary physical and sole legal custody of the child. AVCG sought the States approval to create overriding royalty interests on the leases. The Superior Court Did Not Abuse Its Discretion By Failing To Address The Costs And Risks Of Sale Of The Property. locations provide unparalleled access to industry connections, Arctic research, outdoor They owned a condominium in Anchorage and a vacant lot in Homer. in front of a judge or jury. It awarded Burns-Marshall the $112,334.26 in debt on the Anchorage property and $57,008.39 in debt on the Homer property, and stated that Burns-Marshall could choose to keep or sell both properties.2. Sitka. Other matters that the Alaska Supreme Court may review include non-final decisions by lower courts in civil and criminal cases, attorney disciplinary issues, and state law questions that arise in a case in a federal court. Burns-Marshall argues that the superior court abused its discretion by denying his motion to reopen the trial record 47 days after its oral decision. tickets to many games. Sale of either property and payment of costs associated with the sale would not defeat the court's intent to award Krogman a greater portion of the marital estate because of her significantly smaller earning capacity. S-18026 Superior Court No. Supreme Court Oral Argument Calendar May 2023 Anchorage, Boney Courthouse Case Name Date Time Minutes Case# Per Side S18050 Hospitalization of K.K. hb``` cb%L On the Friday of In this photo taken in February 2015, Alaska Supreme Court Justice Daniel Winfree and Chief Justice Dana Fabe listen to oral arguments in Peter Metcalfe vs. State of Alaska during the first time . students to explore in depth a complicated legal issue and really examine how legal 0000005682 00000 n The court also found in the alternative that it would have awarded Krogman sole legal and primary physical custody based upon its consideration of the child's best interests. Alaska Supreme Court oral arguments are broadcast on Gavel to Gavel Alaska on cable systems throughout the state. On the afternoon of each argument, the Court posts transcripts of that days arguments. Customers should call 874-2311 or email 1WRmailbox@akcourts.gov to schedule a time to meet with the Clerk. Hearings will no longer be streamed on YouTube. Several students have commented to me that it has inspired them to pursue their legal careers further," Fortson says. simulated trial with examination of witnesses. ORAL ARGUMENT OF MATTHEW GUARNIERI ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER IN CASE NO. The wife alleged for the first time during trial that the husband had engaged in a pattern of domestic violence. Its decisions are binding on all other Alaska state courts, and the only court its decisions may be appealed to is the Supreme Court of the United States. 40 Years in Corrections: Are We Going Forward or Backward? Indigenous and Rural oral argument in front of a judge on a legal brief written by the students, and a 7. The written findings of fact and conclusions of law recited almost verbatim its oral decision except that the court had calculated the precise amount of the equalization payment to $73,266.29.3. Burns-Marshall also called several witnesses including one who mentioned an incident during which Krogman threw a picture frame at Burns-Marshall. Generally, the justices will hear arguments in the location of the trial court in which the case was originally decided. Program (ANIROP), Recruitment and Retention of %PDF-1.6 % Tier I was the golden ticket for public employees in Alaska maybe in the country at the time. A final ruling on the matter could take months. 0000001742 00000 n Burns-Marshall filed for divorce in November 2016 and sought joint legal and shared physical custody of their child. %%EOF Alaska Public Media 2023. Wrangell customer service is modified to be appointment only. 0000003205 00000 n All rights reserved. ALASKA COURT RULES 2 210 Record on Appeal. To participate by phone, you need to (1) call the conference line, and then (2) dial the specific Meeting ID associated with the courtroom or judge. Native Community Advancement in Psychology (ANCAP), Alaska Native, Conference line (toll free): 1-888-788-0099 A justice can be removed by being impeached by two-thirds of the Alaska Senate and convicted by two-thirds of the Alaska House of Representatives. We have only required the court to consider the sales costs when sale of the awarded property is inevitable. Fortson, 131 P.3d at 461. Superior Court Judge Lybrand (See above note regarding. The Alaska Supreme Court says the Legislature violated the state constitution when it arbitrarily limited when some public employees could return to work and resume making retirement contributions. the local legal community, and within UAA, the hope is that the presence of a simulated During the trial Burns-Marshall did not object to evidence of substance abuse or domestic violence; he only objected to the application of the domestic violence presumption. Request Copies Wrangell customer service is modified to be appointment only. "Students really appreciate appearing before an actual judge and receiving feedback. courtroom will encourage more students to experience Legal Studies courses. On days when the Court is not in session, the building will be open to the public from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., excluding weekends and federal holidays. such a decision in a brief or at oral argument should review Alaska Appellate Rule 214(d). Contact your local cable provider for channel information. draft a legal brief either supporting or opposing the motion. RELATED: Click to viewPERS Plan Comparison Chartcourtesy of Division of Retirement and Benefits. The court meets after oral argument and on a bi-weekly basis to confer on cases argued orally and on cases submitted on the briefs. %%EOF Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall had waived any right to reopen discovery and that he had actual and constructive notice of the allegations of substance abuse and domestic violence. The Alaska Supreme Court is the state supreme court for the U.S. state of Alaska. Burns-Marshall alleged that Krogman deliberately concealed her intended arguments before trial. UAA is a hub for cutting-edge theoretical and applied research in health, engineering, and the physical and Diversity and Inclusion, Community UAA offers more than 100 degree and certificate programs that consistently prepare students for success after Through Continuous Improvement, Cost of Attendance, Aid Types and Planning It found Krogman more credible than Burns-Marshall and found by a preponderance of the evidence that multiple acts of domestic violence, including several incidents of sexual assault, had occurred. You can explore additional available newsletters here. available via our. Search Cases, Glossaries / Legal Terms 0000005078 00000 n The justices are appointed by the governor of Alaska from slates of candidates approved by the Alaska Judicial Council, an independent commission of Alaskan lawyers and lay citizens. Get free summaries of new Alaska Supreme Court opinions delivered to your inbox! Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall was not required to sell either property. You're all set! Krogman opposed, arguing that Burns-Marshall was not required to sell either property. Each justice faces a judicial retention election after their third year of service and once every ten years thereafter.
Wilt Chamberlain Grandchildren,
Warren Community Center Gym,
Articles A