Read the overview below to gain a balanced understanding of the issue and explore the previews of opinion articles that highlight many perspectives on animal testing. If we use animals for testing purposes, we may consider ourselves to be in a god-like position since we get the power to decide over the lives of those animals. Although animal tests can provide us with a rough estimation regarding how certain medicines will affect human physiology, they might not be suitable to provide us with sufficient knowledge regarding the long-term effects of those drugs. Moreover, animal testing has also been instrumental in saving endangered species from extinction. Another issue of animal testing is that animals often have to suffer from plenty of pain during the trial period. In many cases, animal testing may not even deliver any useful results at all. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-mobile-leaderboard-1','ezslot_14',196,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-mobile-leaderboard-1-0'); However, those kinds of treatments may pose significant dangers to the test persons since the effects of many new drugs are not exactly known in early testing stages. Quite often, before those vaccines will be approved for medical applications on the general public, plenty of trials have to be carried out in order to assure the safety of those vaccines. As estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the . Many of the most important medical advances are attributable to human studies. Right now, millions of mice, rats, rabbits, monkeys, cats, dogs, fish, and other animals used in tests are locked inside cages in laboratories across the country. The previous analysis has shown that are several advantages related to animal testing. Do you think animal testing is ever justified? Therefore, the long-term effects on humans may not be predictable at all from those animal experiments. PETA Leads the Charge: Inside the Global Effort to Take Down Exotic Skins, The Perilous Ripple Effects That Lead Ammo Has on Animals, Humans, and the Planet. These reasons show that animal testing should be banned, it harms animals, there are better options, and animals and humans are very different. 886 Words; 4 Pages; Good Essays. Theyre more efficient and save lives., Kathleen Conlee, the vice president of animal research issues at the Humane Society, said the E.P.A.s move is broad-sweeping and significant., This is the first time a government agency has made such a commitment and timelined its specific goals along the way, Ms. Conlee said. The Act leaves out over 25 million animals at risk of abuse and neglect yearly. Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, refers to procedures performed on living, non-human animals mainly used for researching and testing the effectiveness of medical procedures and products such as cosmetics, drugs, household cleaners, and food additives. Animal research has provided vaccines and cures for rabies, infectious hepatitis virus, anthrax, feline leukemia, and canine parvovirus. Many go insane, rocking back and forth, pacing endlessly inside cages, and doing repetitive motions such as back-flipping. In addition to the many reasons listed above, testing on animals is wasteful, violent, unproductive, and speciesist. For instance, a mouse may only live for a few years, while humans live for many decades. Many scientists estimate that in a few years, newborns may even have a life expectancy of over 100 years. Right now, animals in university laboratories are being mutilated, poisoned, deprived of food and water, immobilized in restraint devices, infected with painful and deadly diseases, burned, electrocuted, irradiated, addicted to drugs, and psychologically tortured. Animal testing has been a staple of research and studies for a long time. The provision would have banned research facilities from using any dog or cat that was . Product Safety: Animal testing helps ensure the safety of drugs and other substances that humans may be exposed to on a daily basis, such as cosmetics. 1. Animal testing is expensive, as one must pay for food, housing, and maintenance, as well as the initial cost of breeding/buying the animal. Testing on animals is unethical. Animal testing is one of the most controversial aspects of modern-day science. Testing on animals is complicated, common, and actually more problematic than you may believe. Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Since it requires plenty of manpower and expensive equipment, animal experimentation can be quite costly. E-Readers Increasing Reading Comprehension, Deterring Dyslexia, The (Non)Mystery Behind Female Ejaculation, Late-Night Work: How to Maximize Utility Without Sacrificing Health, Harm Reduction: Reducing Alcohol Consumption in the Dorms. Whether you need help solving quadratic equations, inspiration for the upcoming science fair or the latest update on a major storm, Sciencing is here to help. Imagine there, day in and day out, horrible things happened to you; Such as being forced fed, being inflicted with burns and various other wounds, poisoned, shut off from members of your species, being deprived of food and water, all while likely even being led to death. Even though animals share many similar characteristics with humans, the results that are obtained in those animal tests are not transferrable to humans 1:1. This is why such animals get affected by the same diseases and health conditions as us. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-leader-2','ezslot_10',190,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-leader-2-0');The findings that we can get from animal testing are not only useful for humans, they can also help to treat other animals. The agency said it would also invest $4.25 million in projects at four universities and a medical center that are developing alternate ways of testing chemicals that do not involve animals. Hence, animal testing can be quite beneficial to cure and to eradicate diseases. Here are just a few of the myriad reasons why many people believe it's time to end this practice. PIP: Some evidence exists that in-vitro studies are capable or potentially capable of providing more rapid, precise, and relevant information than do some animal studies. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights groups but criticized by environmentalists and researchers who said the practice was necessary to rigorously safeguard human health. Since animals cannot volunteer themselves for testing and cannot voice their opinions, some people believe that it is only ethical to test on subjects who willingly give their consent for self testing. The reverse is also true. Animal Testing Pros and Cons. It's unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animals to life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. In fact, some viruses may be able to escape laboratories, which may lead to serious epidemics or even pandemics. There are many opinions about the pros and cons of using animals in scientific research. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. And no, not a discussion about theories or hypotheses but about ethics. Chimpanzees and humans share 99 percent of their DNA, and even mice and humans have a 98 percent overlap in this area. Why or why not? About 100 million animals take part in research every year. Dozens of companies have banned all tests on animals for this purpose. It has even brought certain species from the brink of extinction. Even though there are many advantages of animal research, there are also several problems related to this concept. Animal testing is necessary for medical development. However, some sell products in countries where tests on animals are required. It is also a common practice for animals' eyes to be held open with clips for hours, even days, in the course of testing cosmetics products. When you think about the financial burden countries have to bear, it becomes questionable whether animal testing really provides enough benefits. These and other non-animal methods are humane, and they arent hindered by species differences that make applying animal test results to humans difficult or impossible. First, and most obviously, drugs and medical procedures treat diseases, injuries, and other health problems. aims to reduce the amount of studies that involve mammal testing by 30 percent by 2025. They don't have a voice . One important advantage of animal testing is that we will be better able to understand certain viruses and bacteria once we test their effects on animals. Advances in breast cancer, brain trauma, leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis and tuberculosis are directly attributable to animal experimentation, and without testing on chimpanzees, there would be no hepatitis B vaccine. ProCon.org: Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? It would be wrong to test a drug of unknown effect on humans, which is why we test on animals first. For instance, this is especially true for food supplements since they often contain high concentrations of a certain substance, which may be potentially harmful to human health. From this time on, I wanted to make a contribution to ensure a livable future for the next generations in every part of our beautiful planet. Its not an easy debate, though, because, as is with everything, there are pros and cons of animal testing. It is one of the best simulate of human's physiology. But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. Not only do animals have to suffer from poor living conditions, many of them will also have to die in clinical trials. Many animals, especially primates, share about 90% of their genetic make-ups with humans, so experimenting on such animals can give scientists a good idea about possible reactions in the human body. Moreover, opponents of animal experiments also often claim that we as humans do not have the right to intentionally harm animals from an ethical perspective since they are also living organisms who will suffer from serious pain. Manage Settings However, chances are that standardized processes will lead to a state where animal testing will be the main way to go and that it will be used in an excessive manner that may not be justifiable from an ethical perspective in the long run. Theres no other living creature with the nearest human-like anatomic form than animals. Since our technological progress is quite rapid, we might be able to find better medical research methods in the future so that we no longer need to rely on animal testing. We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. Says It Will Drastically Reduce Animal Testing, Mihir Zaveri, Mariel Padilla and Jaclyn Peiser write about the decision: The E.P.A. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'environmental_conscience_com-leader-1','ezslot_9',149,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-environmental_conscience_com-leader-1-0');Over the past decades, animal testing has been a quite important tool to save many millions of human lives. Text LASH to 73822 to urge OpulenceMD Beauty to stop selling cruel fur lashes! Thus, from an ethical perspective, animal testing can be considered to be rather questionable and there are also many activists who claim that we should completely abandon animal research on a global scale due to that. If you would like to change your settings or withdraw consent at any time, the link to do so is in our privacy policy accessible from our home page.. Animal Testing Should Be Banned Imagine if every day you spent your life in an uncomfortable environment such as a small cage. Animal research can also help us to cure many serious diseases. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. Finally, some say that this reasoning is all beside the point: if your child was dying and animal testing would save him or her, wouldnt you want the testing done? Some animals share a surprisingly high amount of DNA with human beings. And more importantly, if my child were dying and I tried to experiment on my neighbors children to try to save my own child, that would be wrong. It may seem funny to some people that testing genetically modified techniques on animals is right but in my eyes, it isn't. No animal or human self or forced volunteered should undergo testing for science. With the advent of modern molecular biology and its analytical methods, scientists can now quantify the precise extent to which humans resemble other animals, genetically speaking. Most companies claim that no animals were hurt during animal experimentation, but there nonetheless exists a shadow of doubt. Top 10 Animal Testing Pros & Cons Summary List, Personal Brand vs. Corporate Brand: 24 Key Pros & Cons, 24 Key Pros & Cons Of Investing In (Retro) Video Games, 34 Major Pros & Cons Of Investing In Comic Books, Gold Bars vs. Gold Coins: 23 Precious Pros & Cons, 31 Cool Pros & Cons Of Owning A Classic Car, 24 Key Pros & Cons Of Unemployment Benefits, 32 Key Pros & Cons Of Investing In Trading Cards, 30 Precious Pros & Cons Of Investing In Art, Better understanding regarding certain bacteria, Animal testing can help to find new vaccines, Results can not be transferred on humans 1:1, Strict regulations may prevent animal testing, May help to find treatment for future diseases, May also help for the treatment of animals. We aim to provide self-care resources created by students for students and provide a platform where students can discuss health issues. Some people may argue that animal testing is cruel and inhumane, but it is actually a very humane process. If a scientist wanted to study the entire life cycle, it would be a logistics nightmare to study people because of their long lives. We are really excited as this has been something weve wanted for quite some time, said Kitty Block, the president and chief executive of the Humane Society of the United States, an animal protection organization. As I went to university and got my Masters degree in Economics, I did plenty of research in the field of Development Economics. Hence, in order to protect our general public from unknown harmful effects from those products, animal testing may give some indication regarding potential dangers of those products. What is animal testing? Published studies show that 90% of our fellow primates who are used in laboratories exhibit abnormal behavior patterns caused by the psychological stress, social isolation, and confinement to barren enclosures that theyre forced to endure. Still, one cant deny what the world has gained from animal testing. Opponents of animal research often claim that the rights of animals should have a higher priority than potential research findings that could help humanity to cure certain diseases and therefore, animal testing should be completely abandoned. Another reason why animal testing needs to be done is that the animals being tested, have similar organs such as the brain, lungs, heart, liver, etc. This means that the rest are not covered by animal protection laws. Animals have physiological and biological similarities to human Some animals share a surprisingly high amount of DNA with human beings. Animal testing is not a guarantee of product's safety. Especially in countries where animal testing may contradict with religious aspects, those kinds of tests may even be prohibited by law. It's unethical. Text STOP to end, HELP for more info. Every day, mice, rats, cats, dogs, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, birds and primates are used. On Sept. 10, the Environmental Protection Agency said it would move away from requiring the testing of potentially harmful chemicals on animals, a decision that was hailed by animal rights. Research at least with animals who are conscious, and so are able to be harmed or made worse off is wrong for reasons that comparable human research would be wrong. The alternatives are the future. Check out the page below, which makes it quick and easy to urge experimenters to end tests on animals: Take Action: Lets End All Animal Testing. Exact numbers arent available, because mice, rats, birds, and cold-blooded animalswho make up more than 99% of animals used in experimentsare not protected under the federal Animal Welfare Act and their numbers dont even have to be reported. Do you think it is ever justified? Theres been a lot of positive action among other federal agencies, but we want to see all government agencies take this step.. Animal experimentation has clear and undeniable benefits to humankind; for example, the development of drugs to combat deadly diseases. Our study also revealed that drug tests on monkeys are just as poor as those using any other species in predicting the effects on humans. Moreover, some viruses also mutate over time and may change their characteristics. It has already led to the discovery of insulin and hepatitis C; vaccines against polio and hepatitis B; and procedures such as open heart surgeries, coronary bypass surgery, and heart transplantation. Sather Health is a student health website that aims to deliver trusted health information to students and their communities. Take a trip through time using PETAs interactive timeline, Without Consent, to learn about almost 200 stories of twisted animal experiments from the past century. Animal experimentation has been done for many decades or even centuries. U.S. law allows for animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. Still, animal testing findings help veterinaries know how to treat our pets when theyre unwell. And according to cell biologist Robin Lovell-Badge of the MRC National Institute for Medical Research in London, 94 percent of drugs that passed tests in animals failed in people. Its estimated that the cruelty-free cosmetics market could reach $10 billion by 2024. The practice of testing with animals has long prompted complex debates driven by passionate views on morality and scientific imperative. What Happened to Starving Monkeys After 40 Years? Sir Alexander Fleming, who discovered penicillin nearly 100 years ago, remarked, "How fortunate we didn't have these animal tests in the 1940s, for penicillin . This page titled 8.10: Animal Testing Should Be Banned is shared under a CC BY-SA 4.0 license and was authored, remixed, and/or curated by Nathan Nobis (Open Philosophy Press) via source content that was edited to the style and standards of the LibreTexts platform; a detailed edit history is available upon request. Why? However, in order to find vaccines that may protect us against bacteria of various sorts, plenty of research has to be carried out. At this time, the primary use of in-vitro tests is the detection of specific toxic . Therefore, we may want to focus on extensive research in the medical field in order to be able to find suitable medicine to cure future diseases.
Spotify Settings Desktop,
Few Will Enter The Kingdom Of Heaven Scripture,
Craigslist Room For Rent Davis, Ca,
Micetopia Walkthrough,
Articles A